How we keep comparison content useful and independent.

Our content helps readers ask better questions, compare care models, and understand trade-offs — without replacing medical advice.

Last updated: May 1, 2026

Who we are (and are not)

GLP Clinic Finder content is produced by an editorial team. We are not a clinic, pharmacy, or medical practice, and we do not provide medical advice.

We don’t diagnose, prescribe, or determine eligibility for treatment.
We don’t imply clinician review unless a real named clinician reviewed a page.
We focus on transparency, sourcing, and clear limitations.

People-first standard (Who / How / Why)

Pages should help a real reader complete a real task — for example, comparing care models or preparing questions for a consultation.

Who: the intended reader and what decision they’re trying to make.
How: what sources we used and what assumptions/limits exist.
Why: why the page exists beyond SEO — what it helps the reader do next.

Sourcing and citations

We cite authoritative sources for regulatory, safety, and medical information. Provider-specific claims should be linked to a provider’s own published materials or clearly labeled as unverified.

Prefer primary and authoritative sources (e.g., FDA, CDC, NIH, state medical boards).
Avoid health claims that aren’t supported by sources a reader can check.
Separate facts from opinions, and label uncertainty when data is missing.

Updates and corrections

We update pages when something meaningful changes: a source changes, guidance changes, or our explanation improves. We avoid “freshness” edits that only change the date.

Corrections should identify the page URL, the specific claim, and a supporting source.
We may add clarity without changing the page date unless the meaning changed.
If a date is shown, it should reflect a substantive update we can stand behind.

Ready to compare care options?

Use the shortlist flow to organize your preferences before speaking with a licensed clinician.

Build my shortlist